If you have the OS on a separate drive, and not much data on the array to save elsewhere, you should be able to re-create the array without much trouble — use a quick format if you haven’t already. Should I use a separate program and if so, which one? You could follow up on that further in that thread or in the linked StorageReview thread or get a motherboard with an Intel RAID chipset. Also, i tested with writebackcache off and the numbers were horrible reults not shown My C drive is a non-raid drive. As you can see the write speeds have increased in the majority of the tests using ATTO. I am willing to break the RAID array to test it but given it takes many hours to do it I was wondering what to do first, second, etc to get the maximum test information. Sorry to hi-jack this thread but looking at this, I realized that I am going to need some help:
|Date Added:||10 August 2010|
|File Size:||40.13 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Should I ich8od a separate program and if so, which one? The ICH9R has writebackcache enabled and the clip is removed for the Timing icg8do write would give you the write speed, and checking the data the read speed. Another added value is Intel active management technology that allows administrators to remotely diagnose, manage, and cure systems, regardless of the power state or OS condition on those systems. Thanks for your review team. Sign up to our newsletter. Are there any crazy results that I should retest?
Both companies are not very responsive I realized that my HDTune graph is sooooo wavy due to the write speeds correct? I thought the best was the real world Vista copy. I upgraded the Intel Raid Driver driver from v2. If you have the OS on a separate drive, and not much data on the array to save elsewhere, you should be able to re-create the array without much trouble — use a quick format if you haven’t already.
Does this give me us any valuable info? If a technician can boot, diagnose, reboot and recover a system without physically going to a site, it can reduce downtime and also operating costs-two obvious benefits, especially for unmanned installations. Arecont Vision Costar has made an agreement whereby This was pretty time consuming because each time I redid the strip size the system initialized the volume daid hours for 64, 11 hours for 32 and 14 hours for 16kb strip. Multitasking capacity and memory management are built in, along with excellent video and audio performance.
Test different stripe sizes and drive counts. Which one do I use? I ran the benchmarks again as requested but I also had an interesting result that I duplicated.
Please note the ATTO tests. I then thanks to someone on another raiid struggling with this issue, carved out a meg volume and did the allocation size tests very quickly.
Intel® I/O Controller Hub 8 (Intel® ICH8) Family Datasheet
Miguel Alonso, a seasoned technology and business leader, The AIMB implements trusted platform module support; Advantech provides an optional TPM chip that can be plugged in to the board for the added security of boot drive encryption, key and password storage, digital authentication, and hardened file protection. Anyone know how to share this with Intel? These aren’t that far off considering how different the tests are.
All the discussion, tweaks, measurements, experience and knowledge applicable to Intel RAID do not apply to you. Though I would guess that these disk benchmark programs already do just that. This movement of the drive s head s is a very time consuming action, and is called seek time, or access time. I then tested the stand alone drive and it was pretty fast also. As you can see the write speeds have increased in the majority of the tests using ATTO.
If those are your benchies then the read speeds are okay. Also, i tested with writebackcache off and the numbers were horrible reults not shown My C drive is a non-raid drive. Back up any data and use quick format when re-creating.
GAQM-DS2 (rev. ) | Mainboards – GIGABYTE Germany
I am really stuck and have spent at least 30 hours trying to work on this and have rebuilt the ICH9R drives many many times. Either way is it a good idea to do it once I get this working right? More over even if copying rakd a drive to itself could have been done uch8do seeking, since you both read and write to the same drive, this actions don’t occur at the same time, so only half of the time you read and half of the time you write, and you measure what you “transfer”, so your bandwidth will be half of what it really is.